|
|
Programming Sites
| Featured Site |
|
What's Wrong with Perl
Author explains what he considers wrong about Perl, presents Python as an alternative. Descriptions, code samples, links. |
| Rank | Site Information | Ranking Value |
| 1. |
Compares Erlang, GHC Haskell, Standard ML (Alice, MLton); text, tables, graphs. |
105 |
| 2. |
Text compares differences of several main aspects. |
98 |
| 3. |
Also compares C#, Java, C++. By Ben Albahari. |
97 |
| 4. |
Comparison with text, code samples, many reader comments. Michael Tsai weblog. |
96 |
| 5. |
Briefly compares major Linux programming languages: C, C++, Fortran, Java, Lisp, Perl, PHP, Python, Tcl; by Risto S. Varanka. |
94 |
| 6. |
Compares building blocks of two languages, in text and code samples. Developer.com. <small>(December 13, 2007)</small> |
94 |
| 7. |
Text compares languages on many points; by Jim Basney. <small>(May, 1995)</small> |
93 |
| 8. |
Each entry includes history, description, code examples, and references. |
91 |
| 9. |
Derek Sivers spent two years trying to make Rails do something it wasn't meant to do, then realized his old abandoned language (PHP) would do just fine if approached with my new Rails-gained wisdom. <small>(September 22, 2007)</small> |
91 |
| 10. |
Table and notes compare some elements of syntax of Java 1.1 to Smalltalk-80. |
86 |
| 11. |
Informal experiment on different look of Python and Ruby edit-distance programs; text, tables, download files. |
85 |
| 12. |
Text compares several traits of ASP.NET, C#, PHP, Java, Lisp, Perl, Python, Ruby, Smalltalk. Article with forum posts. [Professional PHP] <small>(February 9, 2006)</small> |
85 |
| 13. |
Long text table compares many languages by brief descriptions matched to common tasks. |
84 |
| 14. |
Slide show, was Best Paper at Ada Europe 2006 Conference, Porto, Portugal. By Ben Brosgol, AdaCore; Andy Wellings, University of York, UK. Text, diagrams. [PDF] <small>(June 6, 2006)</small> |
84 |
| 15. |
Yes-No table with definitions compares D, C, C++, C#, Java, on: GC, functions, arrays, OOP, performance, reliability, compatibility, conditional compiling. [Digital Mars] |
83 |
| 16. |
Two medium length documents compare object-oriented languages: Water with ConciseXML syntax, to JSP (JavaServer Pages) and Java; 1 brief list compares Water to PHP. |
83 |
| 17. |
The report concludes by a personal assessment of the three languages with respect to the numerical context. By Bernd Mösli. The reader's experience in scientific programming in C or FORTRAN would be advantageous. |
81 |
| 18. |
Some think Java is like C++. Usual C++ idioms do not apply to Java as it is not a C++ superset or subset; Java is a derivation with many modifications, extensions. Both language syntax are alike, but semantics and philosophy are very different. Java is nearer Ada 95 than C++, except in syntax. |
79 |
| 19. |
Shows source code implementation for the same simple program across over 250 different programming languages. |
77 |
| 20. |
History of Programming Languages encyclopedia, over 8,500 languages, full verified references, code samples, big bibliography, biographical-institutional material, 4,000 language family tree. |
77 |
| 21. |
Brian Kernighan's comparison of Pascal and C |
76 |
| 22. |
A critical view on the C++ and C programming language. [PDF] |
75 |
| 23. |
Compares Turing to Pascal, long text document, no tables or graphs; by Jacqueline L. Martin, 1996, many references. |
75 |
| 24. |
Table and text compares many features of some popular object-oriented languages: C++, C#, Eiffel, Java, Perl, Python, Ruby, Smalltalk, Visual Basic. |
75 |
| 25. |
Small-scale benchmark test run on 9 languages or variants: Java 1.3.1 and 1.4.2, C via gcc 3.3.1, Python 2.3.2 and via Psyco 1.1.1, 4 from Microsoft Visual Studio .NET 2003: Visual Basic/C#/C++/J#. |
73 |
| 26. |
Compares 2 LabVIEW versions with C: brief text, 1 table. [National Instruments] |
72 |
| 27. |
Article by Stephen F. Zeigler. Analysis of a case where most variables were controlled enough to make a comparison between development costs (time, error rates, code size, ...) of the 2 languages. |
72 |
| 28. |
References, zipped Postscript, and inlined gifs. |
71 |
| 29. |
Compares C, Ada, Java, for flaws and strengths in realtime programming, embedded software, built-in support for multithreading; text, code samples. Embedded.com. <small>(November 11, 2003)</small> |
71 |
| 30. |
Comparison of Ruby against Python and other high level dynamic languages. By John Dell'Aquila. |
67 |
| 31. |
Collection of self-reproducing programs: each outputs a copy of its own source code; about 60 languages. |
66 |
| 32. |
Text treats general aspects of language choices, then compares hatred of Perl, Python, Ruby, PHP, Java, C, C++, JavaScript, XSLT, SQL. With many forum comments. [ONLamp.com] <small>(May 12, 2003)</small> |
65 |
| 33. |
By Joe "Zonker" Brockmeier. Text compares a few aspects of C#, Java, C++. [NewsFactor] <small>(January 28, 2003)</small> |
65 |
| 34. |
TOM attempts to address flaws in these languages: C++, Cecil, Common Lisp, Eiffel, Java, Objective-C, Smalltalk. |
63 |
| 35. |
Compares a few variables (size, speed, syntax) in many languages: Brain, C, Cel, F-Script, Forth (gForth, pForth), Icon, Java (Kaffe), Lisp (CLisp, Guile, LispMe, Scheme48), Lua, Perl, Pike, Python, Ruby, Self, Smalltalk (GNU, Squeak, SuperCollider), Tcl. |
61 |
| 36. |
Display time as English sentence, coded in: AWK, C, ICI, Icon, JavaScript, Lite/mSQL, PHP3, Pike, Python, REBOL, Rexx, Ruby, SLang, Spanner. Tested on only Linux (all) and AmigaOS (C and Rexx versions). |
60 |
| 37. |
Common algorithms and other sample code in the languages: Bash and Bourne shells, C/C++, Java, MATLAB/Octave, Perl, Python, Ruby, Scheme. |
60 |
| 38. |
Multipage study compares: 4GL/5GL, 3GL (Ada 95, C, C++, COBOL, FORTRAN, Java, Smalltalk), 2GL (Assembly). Divides language (definition) from traits of products that implement and support it. Several sections, tables, appendixes. |
59 |
| 39. |
Author explains what he considers wrong about Perl, presents Python as an alternative. Descriptions, code samples, links. |
59 |
| 40. |
Tables and text compare Ada 83/95, C, C++; mainly costs, reliability. By Donald J. Reifer. [CrossTalk] <small>(July, 1996)</small> |
59 |
| 41. |
Chuck Moore, father of Forth, says programs can be far smaller in colorForth than C. No code samples. |
57 |
| 42. |
Text descriptions compare C/C++, Java, Pascal, Basic, VeraStream; Oracle; HTML, XML; JavaScript, PHP. |
56 |
| 43. |
Table compares 13 traits at top, 10 languages to side: BETA, C#, C++, C-Talk, Eiffel, Java, Object Pascal, Ruby, Sather, Smalltalk. |
55 |
| 44. |
Published internal study, of Ericsson AXD 301 ATM switch project, using Erlang, C, C++, Java. Results: programmer productivity, code error rates, roughly proportional to source code size. [PDF] |
55 |
| 45. |
Text compares Python and Eiffel, via Tim Peters' Zen rules. |
55 |
| 46. |
Code for code comparison. All features on both languages are compared. |
54 |
| 47. |
Compares Java and Smalltalk, in text and table. By Rodney Bates. [ACM Queue] <small>(September, 2004)</small> |
54 |
| 48. |
Compares the same program in Ada, C, Forth, FORTRAN, Java, Lisp, Perl, R, Ruby. Goal: support decisions in language choice for making compute-intensive Web programs. Text, table, code samples. |
52 |
| 49. |
ROT13 implemented in many programming languages. |
51 |
| 50. |
Brief comparison Curl with High Level assembler, BCX, Dark Basic, Mono (C#/.Net implementation), Python, Squeak, XBasic/XBlite. Curl applet examples. |
50 |
1,351 Sites In Our Database
Last Update: 05-13-2008 02:27pm
Create Account | Maintain Account
Last Update: 05-13-2008 02:27pm
Create Account | Maintain Account
Powered By ToplistX